Controversy is an everyday event in so many of our lives,
and it certainly has been no different for Barbie. Just last year we saw
how Tokidoki Barbie, with all her tattoos, stirred up a bit of commotion.
In 1975 Growing up Skipper and Growing up Ginger were released, and
mothers everywhere had plenty to shout about!
The ability to enlarge dolls breasts by a turn of their arm was just a
bit more than they wanted to see in a toy for their child. Newspapers
reported nationwide about the upset public. Mattel also got their share of
letters from angry moms. Many
stores pulled these busty teenagers from their shelves.
If we look even further back, 1967 brought us the rare,
beautiful, and highly sought after Black Francie (that we all wish we had in
our collections). Believe it or not, she
was originally named “Colored Francie” which is another example of how drastically
our society has changed. She ignited her own negative controversy. Black
Francie had black skin, but her facial features were that of a Caucasian person.
Of course the African-American community wanted to know what that was all about! So Mattel fixed that problem only one year later
(1968) by introducing what the public considers the first black Barbie,
Christy! Christy finally had the black features that the buying public
wanted to see. So for that reason, you
will see Christy called the first Black Barbie over Francie.
In 2001 (box marking) another contentious doll that did fine on the
shelves for a short time was Oreo Barbie. It was a promotion that Mattel did with
Nabisco. They released the white version
of this doll earlier, and sold her in grocery stores alongside their yummy Oreo cookies. But once the black version of the doll hit
the shelves, it became more than just a small issue! It was said that the word
“Oreo” can be used as a derogatory term meaning an African-American is black on
the outside and white on the inside, or basically that person is a sellout. Not surprisingly,
these dolls immediately disappeared from the market!
In 1997 Mattel decided Barbie’s waist should be larger. The reports
of Barbie’s measurements were getting more attention. The claims she had a 36-39 inch bust, 18 inch
waist and 33 inch hips with a height from 5 feet 9 inches all the way up to 6
feet tall, Mattel increased her waist by a 1/8 of an inch! I guess they were
hoping for a more socially acceptable doll, but I doubt that anyone really thought
her measurements were much more realistic.
Seriously! Oh, and another
interesting tidbit of trivia: If you
look closely at Barbie’s bathroom scale from 1965, you will see that it is
permanently stuck on 110 pounds! With
such a voluptuous figure I’m certainly impressed with her weight!
In 2002 Pregnant Midge hit the stores. She had a magnetic stomach with her plastic
baby inside it, and when she was ready to deliver her baby; little girls could
just pull out the newborn. In one case,
Wal-Mart pulled all the dolls from their shelves because parents insisted that the
doll promoted teenage pregnancy, and she was sending the wrong message to their
young girls. Since so many girls wanted
to be like Barbie, the last thing parents wanted was their eight and ten year olds
thinking it was glamorous to be pregnant. Interestingly, the very early
Pregnant Midge dolls even lacked a wedding ring, but of course that was rapidly
fixed! It must have been a man that
missed that one in the R & D department!
Barbie’s controversies
continue to this day, and I’m sure we’ll see even more in the future. There are
still mom’s out there whom would never allow their daughters to play with a
Barbie doll. But, for better or worse, this
mom isn’t on that list! I played with them, my girls played with them
and my granddaughters will play with them. And girls across the globe will
continue to make wonderful memories to carry with them into their adulthood.
Hi Marie,
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this. I had no idea there were so many different Barbie controversies through the years. My own mother was one who did not approve of Barbie and as a result, neither my sister Amy or I ever owned one. When our cousin, Kathy got one we were both envious. I remember that not long after, Kathy also got a Midge doll, plus many cute outfits. Kathy shared her dolls with us whenever we came over. So, while we didn't have any of our own, we weren't totally deprived of Barbies. I must admit that I didn't buy them for my daughter either. I suspect that is because I knew that it would displease my mother even though she had passed away many years prior. If I had it to do over again, I think I would have bought a few Barbies for Becky.
Thanks Janey. What is so funny about this, is that I was sure that you or Amy gave me one of my earlier dolls when I was over at your house. But I was young!
ReplyDeleteMarie, it was probably our cousin, Kathy! As I mentioned, she had several Barbies.
ReplyDeleteInstead of Barbie dolls, our mom gave us Ginny dolls for birthdays. Ginny was made by Vogue and in the 1950's, she was all hard plastic. She was 8" tall and looked like a typical little girl. The earliest ones are worth quite a bit of money now, probably not as much as Barbies but certainly a lot more than the $2.98 I think Mom paid for them! I have seen some listed for over $400. That was several years ago. It could be more now. I have some that were mine as a child but they were well played with. I also have some that are collectible, with original clothing and hair. I guess I never grew up. I have always liked dolls!
Hello Marie-I so agree with your last paragraph. I love Barbies & have all my childhood Barbies from the 70's. My 2 1/2 yo granddaughter loves to play, she has quite the imagination & a full vocabulary-I love to play with her & have collected quite a bit-My favorites are all the controversial ones-but we enjoy them all!!!
ReplyDelete